Tech Industry Leaders Call for AI Labs to Pause Development for Safety – A statement signed by 2,600 tech industry leaders and researchers suggests AI labs suspend their work for six months, and if they refuse, governments should enforce a development moratorium.
The group believes that AI is “now becoming human-competitive at general tasks,” and asserts that powerful AI systems should be developed “only once we are confident that their effects will be positive and their risks will be manageable.” “Unfortunately, this level of planning and management is not happening, even though recent months have seen AI labs locked in an out-of-control race to develop and deploy ever more powerful digital minds that no one — not even their creators — can understand, predict, or reliably control,” the open letter states.
People Also Read: Elon Musk Announces Twitter to Promote Only Paying Users’ Tweets
Tesla CEO Elon Musk, politician Andrew Yang, AI scholar Gary Marcus, and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak are among the signatories of the petition. In addition, the letter states that AI developers must collaborate with policymakers if they are to create effective AI systems.
The letter emphasizes that artificial intelligence could pose a threat to democracy and generate significant economic and political disruptions. Despite the fact that the letter has more than 2,000 supporters, not everyone agrees with halting, and some have deemed it “ridiculous.”
“Among all the obvious reasons why this temporary pause seems like a silly idea, I also can’t help feeling like this could be a knee-jerk reaction by the corporate elite after having seen just how easily this technology will make many of their goods and services irrelevant,” one individual wrote.
“This is a bad call. Only forward,” another individual tweeted. On Thursday, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong shared his opinion on the matter. Armstrong doesn’t think fear should stop progress and said that people should be wary of such plans. “Count me among the people who think this is a bad idea,” Armstrong tweeted.
“There are no ‘experts’ to adjudicate this issue, and many disparate actors will never agree. Committees and bureaucracy won’t solve anything.” Armstrong added: “As with many technologies, there are dangers, but we should keep marching forward with progress because the good outweighs the bad.”
People Also Read: Meta Winding Down Support for NFTs on Facebook and Instagram
“The marketplace of ideas leads to better outcomes than central planning. Don’t ever let fear stop progress, and be wary of anyone trying to capture control in some central authority.” Many others believe that pausing AI development is not a good idea, and some insist that the plan is for AI monopolies that are already leading the race to maintain self-preservation.
Regius Professor and CEO of Chemify, Lee Cronin, wrote, “This is nonsensical. It’s like asking to destroy the book that explains how to build the printing press, which itself was printed on the printing press.” The discussion regarding a pause in AI development has become a topical and controversial subject this week, and it’s currently unclear whether AI labs will follow through with the suggestion.
